the SHIPP-study
Optimizing care in children with blunt head trauma
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major health concern both in the adult and pediatric population, and a common cause for children to visit the emergency department. Approximately 10% of pediatric TBI are moderate to severe, with a significant incidence
of intracranial injury and GCS 3-13. 80-90% of the children have suffered a minimal to mild TBI with GCS 14-15. The need for neurosurgical intervention in this major
group of patients, with over 3 million emergency department visits in US between 2005 and 2009, is low (0,1-0,2%) but not negligible . The incidence of trauma-related
intracranial abnormalities on computed tomography (CT) of the skull in this group is 4-6%. Nevertheless, if undiagnosed intracranial complications as hematomas may be
life-treathning and/or related to major morbidity.
CT of the head will identify these acute complications, but irradiation of the brain result in risk of cancer later in life. Other issues related to CT scanning in this population are the need for sedation (risk of aspiration) and resource allocation. Clinical decision rules (CDRs) as the PECARN-rule2 have been derived in US intendend to aid decision making, but concerns are raised as studies have shown that adoption of this guideline in external populations may increase CT-rate.
For Scandinavian use, an evidence and consensus based guideline for initial
management of minor and moderate head trauma in children (SNC 2016) has been developed and published (Fig 1). It stratifies risk for clinically important intracranial
injury, and management recommendations are based upon this risk stratification.
However, before large-scale clinical implementation, a validation and further development study to ensure accuracy and security of the guideline has to be performed.
Primary aim
To perform an internal validation and development study of the new Scandinvian guidelines
for management of minor and moderate head trauma in pediatric patients.
Ethics
The study has recieved ethical approval.
Setting
This is a pragmatic, prospective observational multicenter (n=16) study in Scandinavia (Sweden and Norway). Children assessed in the emergency
department (ED) due to head trauma during the last 24h with GCS 9-15 are included after informed consent, given none of the exclusion criterias are present (Fig 2). Full scale inclusion begun in January 2019.
Intervention
The study is observational without intervention and management in ED should follow
hospitals ordinary guideline for traumatic head injury.
Data
Medical history, risk factors, signs/symptoms, radiology reports, management in the ED
and symptoms every third month till full recovery are recorded via three sequential
web-based case report forms (Entermedic®).
Endpoint
Primary endpoint is a composite of death, neurosurgery, admission > 2 days or
intubation > 1 day due to head injury (clinically important intracranial injury).
Statistics
Sample size is calculated to 5300 patients, for a 95% CI regarding sensitivity, specificity
and positive/negative predictive value for the primary endpoint, however not more than 4 years of active inclusion.
A variety of substudies are planned, some of them are listed below.
1. Biomarkers
Collection of capillary or venous blood will be done in 500 patients with GCS 14-15 after traumatic head injury in selected EDs with dedicated pediatric nurses experienced in venipuncture in children.
S100B and additional, at this moment not specified biomarkers will be analysed in batch when all samples are collected.
Goal is to be able to add biomarkers to the guideline and thereby increase sensitivity and specificity for clinically important intracranial injury.
2. Comparision with other clincial decision rules
Performance of the SNC 2016 guideline in this Scandinavian cohort will be compared to other validated clincal decsion rules as PECARN, CATCH and CHALICE. An external validation3 and comparison in the APHIRST-cohort has been performed and published 2018.
3. User-friendliness
When including a patient, a subset of doctors in the ED will be asked to assess user-friendliness of the SNC 2016 guideline.
4. Long-term outcome
Patients will be followed to remission of symptoms via questionnaires sent out every third month. A subset of patients with post-concussive syndrome will be examined by a pediatric neurologist.
1. Åstrand R, Rosenlund C, Unden J: Scandinavian guidelines for initial management of minor and moderate head trauma in children. BMC medicine (2016), 14(1):33.
2. Kuppermann N, et al. Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2009; 374(9696):1160–70
3. Undén J, et al. External validation of the Scandinavian guidelines for management of minimal, mild and moderate head injuries in children. BMC Medicine (2018) 16:176
Copyright © All Rights Reserved